I'm not so familiar with your release procedures and scripts.

I do think the next release should be delayed until this is sorted though.

Bob.


2008/6/18 Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It would be nice but I haven't fixed it yet. Can you fix it and I will be
> back later tonight (in three hours or so) and do the work then?
>
>         /Linus
>
>
> 2008/6/18, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Hi Linus
>>
>> Will you have issue 5159 resolved in that same release?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> 2008/6/18 Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Great! I will proceed with the 0.25.7 release tonight or tomorrow night
>> > then.
>> >
>> > Another thing... could I bother you to change the name of the
>> > anarres-cpp-file or change back to how it was before? I would like to
>> > have
>> > the version numbers last since my skript that calculates the name for
>> > java
>> > web start removes and adds the version numbers only if they are last in
>> > the
>> > name (before the suffix).
>> >
>> >         /Linus
>> >
>> >
>> > 2008/6/16, Luis Sergio Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>
>> >> Hello Linus,
>> >>
>> >> Linus Tolke wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> This, more or less, renders the 0.25.6 release useless. Could we make
>> >>> a
>> >>> 0.25.7 release as soon as this is solved? Who is working on this?
>> >>>          /Linus
>> >>
>> >> I've attached a modified anarres-cpp-1.2.3.jar to issue-argouml-cpp #27
>> >> (http://argouml-cpp.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=27). If this is
>> >> copied
>> >> over the existing  file with the same name in the ext/ directory it
>> >> will
>> >> remove the problem, and therefore it enables verifications in 0.25.6 to
>> >> occur. I know, its a work-around!
>> >>
>> >> For 0.25.7 - if you move forward with that one - I already committed a
>> >> better fix to the argouml-cpp module in revision 228.
>> >>
>> >> Tom already committed a fix to issue #5089 in revision 14958 - he
>> >> didn't
>> >> marked that issue as FIXED, though.
>> >>
>> >> So, I think that this is prepared for an additional release. Do you
>> >> agree
>> >> Tom?
>> >>
>> >> Regards and apologies for the lost work,
>> >>
>> >> Luis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to