Sure, we can do that.
I have implemented a solution to the Java Web Start problem, at least for
all other modules.
Shall I remove the seq2 module from src/argouml-build/build.xml so that it
won't be pulled into the release?
/Linus
2008/6/22, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> The limited testing means that we simply do not know the seriousness
> of the bugs. It seems that it just has not had enough testing for
> these to come out in the past and we're discovering them very last
> minute.
>
> While we have seq2 defects existing then the temptation is for me to
> look at those rather than the other P1/P2 defects and so you could say
> a final release is already being delayed seq2.
>
> Christian should be concentrating entirely on this years GSOC project
> so I wouldn't want to see him distracting himself with seq2 defects at
> the moment.
>
> I would suggest that the next release should be the first alpha
> release (ie no more enhancements allowed after that point) and we
> should concentrate only on our defects and getting the final release
> out.
>
> However could we consider to be a P2 defect anything that won't allow
> a module release of seq2 at a later date?
>
> e.g.
> 1) provide a listener to detect end of project load (probably
> registered with PersistanceManager)
> 2) Solve the problem of including seq2 when running with JWS.
>
> We can then release 0.28.1 at any future date when se2 is considered
> stable with no other changes to ArgoUML base, only the module
> included.
>
> Bob.
>
>
> 2008/6/22 Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Well, yes. I will let you and most notably Christian have the last say in
> > this.
> >
> > I think the benefit of showing a new implementation could even out the
> > drawbacks of the limited testing performed on it. It is all in the
> > seriousness of the bugs and to what extent they can be fixed in time for
> the
> > release and that is for you and Christian and everyone else involved in
> the
> > testing and fixing to decide.
> >
> > /Linus
> >
> >
> > 2008/6/22, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> What is your take on the seq2 situation? I presume based on most
> >> recent conversation that that will be withdrawn from this release.
> >>
> >> Bob.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2008/6/21 Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> > Since the issue 5151 is a P1 issue that is not resolved yet, I will
> not
> >> > make
> >> > the 0.25.7 release today. Is there a plan for this issue to be solved?
> >> >
> >> > /Linus
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
