OK. Great idea.
This means that I should make a release 0.26.1 as soon as possible with the
exact same contents as 0.26.1.beta1.
I will go right ahead with that.
/Linus
2008/11/18 Christian López Espínola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi all,
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Linus Tolke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since I get the strong feeling that we should include the solution to
> issue
> > 5434 into the upcoming release (beta or not), I will not do the release
> > tonight but wait until Christian has merged that into the branch. I hope
> > this is a correct interpretation of your postings.
> >
> > /Linus
>
> So issue 5434 should be in a new stable release soon. Are there any
> other issues that people wants to see in?
>
> I'd advocate the idea of doing a stable release (0.26.1) with the
> contents of 0.26.1-beta (AKA 0.26.1).
> We can then follow with other minor releases carefully if it is needed.
>
> So I propose promoting 0.26.1-beta to 0.26.1 and I can start working
> in 0.26.2 with issue 5434 fixed (anyone can propose other fixes).
> This should be the last stable release of 0.26, and we should be back
> to work on 0.28.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Christian López Espínola <penyaskito>
>
