Hi Dave, that's cool! You could start with a placeholder page with a link to issue 1834. I've done something similar with Tom's collecting issue for UML2 support. Which brings me to the point how the wiki and issuezilla could be related. Bob wrote:
> A wiki should allow us to gather requirements and come to an agreed > design before implementing. If there are complex or contraversial > issues then maybe they should have a wiki page of their own. My view is, that issuezilla is for the discussions, while the wiki contains the (agreed) summary. At least for Undo and UML2 it could be done that way. Thomas -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:02:40 +0000 > Von: Dave Thompson <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] The move of the Cookbook is slowly progressing > > Once I'm done with issue 1048, the next one I plan to look at is > > implementation of todo. > > Of course (?) what I actually meant was *undo*. > > Dave > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=985680 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: > [[email protected]]. -- Sensationsangebot verlängert: GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 16,37 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K1308T4569a ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=985773 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
