I've just created issue 5692, 5693 and 5694. Could those more familiar with sequence diagram usage confirm my interpretation for those issues.
One of my concerns is how to remedy this and manage the fact that our previous sequence diagram implementation has been writing incorrectly. Any feeling as to priority for these issues? As this is behaviour of the existing implementation I partly lean to P3. But as we have a new implementation being released that I would hope would be used far more it would be nice to get this acting correctly from the start for the new implementation. Possibly we could try and fix 5692 but leave 5693 as is for now. Bob. ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1126881 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
