Hi Alexander, it is an interesting idea to use the same grammar for both sources and classfile import, provided that by reflection you mean decompiling. Feel free to try this approach. In the end, the solution has to be measured by how it meets the functional, nonfunctional (performance!), maintainability and licensing(!) requirements compared to other solutions.
I added a comment to issue 3204, can we discuss there regarding generics? Thomas -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:52:22 -0800 (PST) > Von: Alexander Lepekhine <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: RE: Re: [argouml-dev] classfile.g for antlr-3.1.1 > Hi Thomas, > > >> avoiding Antlr at all would be an option, too ;-) ) > > I like the idea I found in the internet - to use reflection and build some > structure from it, then use antlr to parse this structure. What do you > think about it? Using antlr for binary class is cool, but the mentioned > approach is very simple and straightforward. > > Alexander > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1145778 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: > [[email protected]]. -- Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1149963 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]].
