Hi *, To solve the problem you describe, it would be sufficient to show a message (when saving) like this: "Warning. The file 'test.zargo' has been modified on disk since it was read. Do you want to overwrite anyhow? - Yes/No"
This instead of a lock, which seems to me a dangerous thing to do. Kind regards, Michiel Christian Heinrich wrote: > Hi there, > > currently, it is possible to work on a .zargo file with several > instances of ArgoUML. I was just wondering if this might lead to > inconsistencies and whether we should use some kind of lock mechanism > for that. > > What do you think? > > Christian > > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1431963 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: > [[email protected]]. > To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: > [[email protected]] > ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1441012 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
