Linus Tolke wrote: > Since the tracker code is in the project_tools.html (to appear on every > page), let me suggest that you make a copy of the main page in another > one of the projects i.e. you put your copy of the main page in one of > the other projects. Perhaps you have already thought of this.
In my index2.html, I have included the new code for the new ga.js. I have been testing the page using /nonav/ to avoid it loading urchin.js from project_tools.html. My first test was to change the wording of the tracking links for the downloads, then to see if the new wording was correctly listed in the google analytics page. According to google, it takes 12-48 hours for any new information to appear in the tracking stats. > I suggest the argouml-gen project since it doesn't have any Google > analytics code. Once you have the copy of the main page working there > you can update the argouml-stats project. This is interesting because it > contains links to pdf files that work in the same way as the links to > the downloads > (example > http://argouml-stats.tigris.org/svn/argouml-stats/trunk/www/documentation/index.html) > > but I consider it less important than the argouml-downloads project. The > argouml-downloads project will need update of all index files in all > releases (or at least the releases where this is enabled (since 0.22)). My aim was actually to make all of the downloads track as though they had come directly from argouml-downloads. The ga.js specifically allows tracking of multiple sub domains on one project, so I intend to use this. > There is now a script somewhere that goes through most > project_tools.html files and recreate them according to a template. When > you are about to update the tracking for all projects (ada, csharp, cpp, > ..., es, de, pt, ru, ...), update and use the script to automate that > tedious work. Ok, could you tell me where it is? I updated all of the project_tools.html files some time ago, and wasn't aware of the update script then... perhaps it is a new thing. > Shall we add Analytics to the Users' wiki and Forum too? If so, shall we > use the same Analytics project or another one? I think it is only worth spending time tracking things we want to see statistics for. If there are direct downloads on the users' wiki or forum, then yes, we should probably track them, to get better overall statistics of how many downloads there have been. The only thing to consider here, is that it *might* be useful one day to know what proportion of the total downloads come from the users' wiki. If we update the analytics to track them in exactly the same way, then it may be that we won't be able to find this information. Or perhaps there is some way to see the referrer page for a download; I haven't found out yet. Either way, I don't think this is a big problem. One other question: Is there a reason why the download tracking links contain the text /DOWNLOAD/, even though this is not actually part of the url for any of the downloads? Regards, Dave ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1467699 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
