On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Bob Tarling <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess we need to define the element types that are new to UML2 in > the MetaTypes interface of the model.
For the most part, the initial implementation should only require the methods which have been defined. I've been deprecating obsolete method names and adding ones which match the UML 2.x meta model names, but only on a one-to-one replacement basis. Things which are brand new should, by definition, be unused and presumably therefor unneeded. > Should we just add all the getters there or extends MetaTypes with MetaTypes2? I'm not aware of any implementations of Model subsystems outside of the project, so I basically consider it OK to add things which break implementations (ie the SPI side of the interface as opposed to the API side). The interface has been extended on a frequent basis for years, so if it was causing anyone problems they would have hopefully spoken up by now. Tom ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=1566799 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
