Thomas Neustupny wrote: > - removing setOwner calls (issue 4075) > > Is this ok to go into the fix, or do we need to exclude something? Otherwise, > the current svn could be taken. >
Yes, this is OK to go into the new release, since this makes the implementation more consistent with the rest of ArgoUML. Regards, Michiel ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2363127 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
