> So they use Parameter as the parameter, not Class, Interface or Classifier. > > I propose to go back to this as a solution. If it worked for MD it > should be good enough for us. > > Alexander - what was your inspiration to use Parameter all that time > ago? Was that a comparison with some other tool?
I choose Parameter because I could assign name and type to it. Further investigation shows that this solution contradicts UML spec in several points (places? sorry for my English). I didn't look at other tools, just reading the spec. > Lets not forget template binding. Did you do any work for the Alexander? I remember but can we write binding not knowing what template parameter is? ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2430336 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
