I resolve the issue 6081 (as invalid). I don't think it is a candidate.
Are there any other issues for 0.30.1? What more testing do we want to do
before being confident enough for the stable 0.30.1 release?
/Linus
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Bob Tarling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Unfortunately issue 6069 had to be reopened.
>
> Linus, could you make sure revision is 18355 is merged to branch.
>
> I'd suggest we then delay before deciding another beta its probably
> not worth it if we get nothing else. Maybe we can just go live with
> that one last change.
>
> Issue 6081 could be argued to be a priority however the only person to
> hit it seems to working with their own custom build. What's your view
> on that Linus?
>
> Regards
>
> Bob
>
> On 27 April 2010 22:14, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The beta4 is now available for downloads. Please use it for all testing
> > before the 0.30.1 release.
> > /Linus
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Linus Tolke Tigris <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I am now almost ready for the 0.30.1.beta4 release that is a copy of
> trunk
> >> in all projects except the argouml-java where two commits are left out.
> I
> >> will proceed in a few minutes.
> >> /Linus
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2599025
>
> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [
> [email protected]].
> To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator,
> email: [[email protected]]
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2599210
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email:
[[email protected]]
