For UML2 activity diagrams I halted for a while thinking about how to apply notations. I think the notations are an incredibly important subsystem as they remove knowledge of both GEF and so will help with any move to a different diagram implementation should it be required in future.
I have prepared something on the wiki regarding how I would like to see notations split out into its own module and improved - http://argouml.tigris.org/wiki/Notation_Architecture I'd appreciate any feedback. I propose to leave the old notation architecture in place while this is developed for the UML2 activity diagram only. Once this is working I'll move the state diagram forward to a similar level of functionality and move any common code for state and activity into another shared module. Regards Bob ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2717692 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
