Oops - my reply went to Tom instead of dev list See below
On 14 April 2011 22:13, Tom Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Bob Tarling <[email protected]> wrote: >> Linus said: >>> There seems to be a new dependency between the >>> argouml-core-diagrams-activity2 module and the argouml-core-notation module. >>> Looking at this from above it is obvious that we should not have such >>> dependencies >> >> How can the activity diagram not rely on notations to generate the >> text they display? They have done so for a long time. > > I can't tell from Linus' description which way the dependency points > and why it's a problem, but I would have thought that the only real > issue is with cycles in the dependency graph. > > The whole notion of 'core,' 'non-core,' 'more-core-than-core' seems to > me to be bound to break down sooner or later. The dependency graph > should be considered independent of granularity or "layers." > > As far as managing build dependencies go, most of the alternatives are > discussed in this StackOverflow question > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27818/how-can-i-manage-osgi-build-dependencies > > ArgoEclipse currently uses the Eclipse PDE headless build which is, > honestly, kind of a pain to set up, but it does avoid the issue of > having to replicate dependency information since it just uses the > existing dependencies documented in the plugin manifests. In the > future, we'll probably look at migrating to the Buckminster build > environment. > > Tom > ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2719921 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
