The UML2.3 Superstructure lists the following diagram types Activity Diagram - Activities on page 303 Class Diagram - Classes on page 23 Communication Diagram - Interactions on page 473 Component Diagram - Components on page 147 Composite Structure Diagram - Composite Structures on page 167 Deployment diagram - Deployments on page 199 Interaction Overview Diagram - Interactions on page 473 Object Diagram - Classes on page 23 Package Diagram - Classes on page 23 Profile Diagram - Profiles on page 669 State Machine Diagram - State Machines on page 541 Sequence Diagram - Interactions on page 473 Timing Diagram - Interactions on page 473 Use Case Diagram - Use Cases on page 603
Our Collaboration Diagram == Commuinication Diagram Our Class Diagram I think covers all of Class Diagram, Package Diagram, Object Diagram (with defect 6275 fixed). I think it also covers Profile Diagram That leaves the following new diagram types Component Diagram (looks very similar to Deployment Diagram to me), Composite Structure Diagram, Interaction Overview Diagram and Timing Diagram Is it considered acceptable for our first UML2 release to NOT contain those last 4 diagram types and add support for those in later releases? I would expect for our first UML2 release to have full model support in the explorer and model element property panels. Regards Bob ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2738194 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
