Hello!
That style of comments are instructions to the javadoc generator. I assume
that someone at some point thought that it would be nice if the javadoc
could be provided with information on the underlying model and do some nice
trick.
I also assume that the necessary model-aware plug-in into javadoc was
either never developed or lost. Without it I guess javadoc will generate an
error message.
If there is still someone out there who thinks it is still a good idea to
develop such a javadoc plug-in I can accept the error message. If noone has
that vision, it is better to remove this code or change it to a regular
comment.
In any case, Java5-style annotation are more powerful and built into the
compiler so that might be considered a better solution to this.
/Linus
2012/4/2 Bob Tarling <[email protected]>
> I think this just goes back to the fact the code generation was written
> before generics existed. It is just trying to add some info as to the type
> of the collection.
>
> If this can be changed to generated a proper 1.5+ collections with
> generics then the extra comment is not needed.
>
> Bob.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2943857
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
[[email protected]].
To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email:
[[email protected]]
