Hello ! I'm not used to work with jarsigner. I just search what can be the problem by comparing two jar, the old one that is ok (0.34) and the new one.
> Hello Laurent! > > Are you saying that emf requires SHA1 and cannot work with SHA-256? I think > this is strange. Why should the application care how the classes are signed? No, I don't think emf requires SHA1. I just see that Java7 was used and create a SHA-256 in ones files (.SF), and there is still SHA-1 in other one(.MF). > In that case it looks like there is a simple fix. Shall I make a 0.35.2 > with this fix? If you think that you have the solution and the best way is to test it, you can do it. Is this problem solved http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=3087690 ? > > /Linus > > 2014-09-07 12:55 GMT+02:00 Laurent BRAUD <laurentbraud dot dev at gmail dot > com>: > > > I compare MATA-INF of the jar of v0.34 and v0.35 > > > > The new ARGOUM.SF has been created with java7 and have no SHA-1 (only > > SHA-256-Digest) > > It looks like that it is a change with Java 6. According to this link : > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/android-developers/JMQsdsKr7-0 > > "SHA256 is the new default in Java 7 jarsigner, so you need to specify the > > -digestalg option to use SHA1" > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=3088055 > > > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [ > > dev-unsubscribe at argouml dot tigris dot org]. > > To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, > > email: [linus at tigris dot org] > > ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=3088112 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [dev-unsubscr...@argouml.tigris.org]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [li...@tigris.org]
