So you'd agree that it should have required an explicit definition of the
inputs?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Tal Liron <[email protected]> wrote:

> Any help in debugging would be appreciated!
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:02 PM, DeWayne Filppi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > For reasons that somewhat mystify me, the template is installing with no
> > errors now.  I fixed it by removing the inputs definition I had in the
> > terminal.yaml file, which is counter-intuitive.  I used to have, in the
> > node type definition:
> >
> >     interfaces:
> >       Standard:
> >         create:
> >           implementation: cloudify-utilities-plugin >
> > cloudify_terminal.tasks.run
> >           inputs:
> >             calls:
> >               type: list
> >               entry_schema: call_type
> >
> > I defined the inputs because I thought I had to.  This was the source of
> > the error I mentioned in another thread (regarding yaml-1.1).  In any
> case,
> > by commenting it out, I got no validation errors, and the terminal calls
> > are made as expected.  In the node template, I still pass inputs:
> >
> >       interfaces:
> >         Standard:
> >           create:
> >             inputs:
> >               calls:
> >                 - action: exit
> >
> > This doesn't seem as though it should be possible.  In any case, the
> latest
> > has been pushed to the repo:
> > https://github.com/dfilppi/fortigate-tosca-example
> >
> > DeWayne
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:37 AM, DeWayne Filppi <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For those interested, I'm in the process of implementing a TOSCA
> template
> > > for the initial deployment and configuration of a Fortigate VNF in
> > > Openstack.  It uses a couple of borrowed Cloudify plugins: one for
> > > Openstack itself (https://github.com/cloudify-
> cosmo/cloudify-openstack-
> > > plugin), and one for the terminal plugin (part of the Cloudify
> incubator
> > > "utilities" project (https://github.com/cloudify-
> > > incubator/cloudify-utilities-plugin).
> > >
> > > The basic idea is that a network and router is created with public
> > access,
> > > and a private network with no direct public access.  In between is the
> > > Fortigate firewall VNF that controls access to instances running on the
> > > private network.  The initial template just sets up the VNF and
> networks.
> > > The next template (TBD) will deploy a service on the private network
> and
> > > reconfigure the firewall to allow access via port forwarding.   This is
> > > very much a work in progress (the VNF configuration isn't quite working
> > > yet):
> > >
> > > https://github.com/dfilppi/fortigate-tosca-example
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to