> On Oct 23, 2017, at 1:12 PM, Tal Liron <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> TOSCA says some things about how imports happen, but not that match. I
> think we are aligned with the spec here.
That is what I suspected, but best to check explicitly.
> By the way, I'm quite proud of the implementation in ARIA: we handle
> imports in a threadpool, so that if you are importing from many http
> repositories at the same time, each download will happen simultaneously.
> Performance is as optimal as it can be. (We are also caching the results
> according to the conditional http request standard.)
I had no reservations about that. 8)
—Tom
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Thomas Nadeau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Just for my own understanding, is the algorithm you describe used
>> based on what TOSCA specifies,
>> or is this our implementation detail? I ask because you can imagine
>> process done
>> one at a time, i.e.: per-file, but the processed results can of course, be
>> different.
>>
>> —Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Tal Liron <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, you can do that. Think of imports as being essentially like a smart
>>> copy-paste from one YAML file to another. In the end, ARIA treats it as
>>> just one big service template.
>>>
>>> In other words, the requirements-and-capabilities matching occurs only
>>> after all imports were done and the final service template is valid.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Steve Baillargeon <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you Tal
>>>>
>>>> Can ARIA handle the case when ST1 imports ST2 with a relationship (link)
>>>> between source node template AA defined in ST1 and target node template
>> BB
>>>> defined in ST2?
>>>> For instance, a SoftwareComponent node is defined in ST1 with a specific
>>>> requirement to run on a Compute node that is defined in ST2.
>>>>
>>>> -Steve
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tal Liron [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 2:18 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: Note template names
>>>>
>>>> Some good questions here. Let me try to break it down,
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Steve Baillargeon <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Node template names must be unique within a given service template.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Actually, there is an "interesting" issue with this: in YAML, a
>> dict
>>>> could have multiple keys with the same name. What happens in that case
>> is
>>>> that subsequent keys (node template names in this case) override
>> previous
>>>> ones of the same name. So, you can syntactically have two node
>> templates of
>>>> the same name, but only one will count.
>>>>
>>>> We tried to find ways in ARIA to emit an error in this case, but
>> actually
>>>> it's very hard to do because it's a YAML spec issue that allows it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What about the case when ST1 imports ST2 as follows.
>>>>> ST1 has 2 node templates: template A derived from node type X and
>>>>> template B derived from node type Y.
>>>>> ST2 has 1 node template: template A derived from node type Z .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually, the "imports" keyword isn't 100% clear in the TOSCA spec. What
>>>> we do in ARIA is merge the dicts, and again identical keys (node
>> template
>>>> names) will override without error. So, the final behavior will be
>>>> undefined.
>>>>
>>>> However, I think that in this particular case ARIA can do something
>> more,
>>>> because we handle merging ourselves (it's not an issue of the YAML
>> spec). I
>>>> have opened a new JIRA about this:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-390
>>>>
>>
>>