Agree.
We should merge on 0.3.
Regards
JB
On 01/26/2011 06:12 PM, Timothy Ward wrote:
Hi,
ARIES-556 was raised as a critical bug against 0.2 on Monday, and has been
fixed in trunk. It would be good to get it into the 0.3 release rather than
have a known critical bug in the JPA code. Is there a chance of respinning the
JPA component for 0.3?
Regards,
Tim
----------------------------------------
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:37:42 +0000
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Aries 0.3 release candidate 00
To: [email protected]
On 24 January 2011 18:34, zoe slattery wrote:
On 24/01/2011 17:23, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
So far, I've checked the source zips' .md5 .sha1 .asc .asc.md5
.asc.sha1 files. I've run mvn -Prat on the unzipped source and get a
problem for each of the DEPENDENCIES files. I think we hit this in 0.2
and 0.1 and decided to overlook it as they are generated files.
Curious - I have just run 'mvn -Prat install' in the release candidate
branch and I _don't_ get a problem with DEPENDENCIES files.
I actually used mvn rat:check when I was checking the release artifacts -
didn't see a problem with DEPENDENCIES there either.
You are Maven 3? Could that be the difference, I'm running Maven 2.2.1.
I seem to remember seeing this with Maven 2.2.1 from before. I think
what happens when doing the release is the DEPENDENCIES file is
created then the source zip is created and the DEPENDENCIES file is
included in that. Moving from Maven 2.2.1 to 3, I don't think RAT has
changed.
I just tried it with Maven 2.2.1 and get the same result:
*****************************************************
Files with Apache License headers will be marked AL
Binary files (which do not require AL headers) will be marked B
Compressed archives will be marked A
Notices, licenses etc will be marked N
AL default-parent/java5-parent/pom.xml
AL default-parent/pom.xml
!????? DEPENDENCIES
N LICENSE
N NOTICE
AL pom.xml
*****************************************************
I don't think it's worth respinning the release for this, as it is a
generated file and doesn't have any intellectual property in it.
I'm still to check the binaries though, but not today.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On 24 January 2011 13:53, zoe slattery wrote:
Hi all
I've staged a release candidate 00 for the 0.3 release. Please use this
thread for any discussion. If you check the release please will you say
exactly what you checked - even if it passes?
Thanks
Zoė
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
---------------------------------
HomePage
http://www.nanthrax.net
---------------------------------
Contacts
[email protected]
[email protected]
---------------------------------
OpenSource
BuildProcess/AutoDeploy
http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net
Apache ServiceMix
http://servicemix.apache.org
-----------------------------------
PGP : 17D4F086
