Hi Emily, That was for the 0.2.1 release of the application component.
Tim ---------------------------------------- > Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:21:25 +0000 > Subject: Re: License is incomplete in three files of blog itests > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > Thanks, Alasdair. I thought there will be a respin due to the copyright year > problem Tim mentioned:o. > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Alasdair Nottingham wrote: > > > Err, well I think the vote on 0.3 passed so I guess no, but thanks for the > > fix so it'll be right next time. > > > > Alasdair Nottingham > > > > On 3 Feb 2011, at 21:36, Emily Jiang wrote: > > > > > Just noticed there are three files in blog itests with the incomplete > > > license. The license reads: > > > > > > /* > > > * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file > > > * distributed with this work for additional information > > > * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file > > > * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the > > > * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance > > > * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at > > > * > > > * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > * > > > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > > > * software distributed under the License is distributed on an > > > * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY > > > * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the > > > * specific language governing permissions and limitations > > > * under the License. > > > */ > > > > > > As you can see the first line 'Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation > > > (ASF) under one' was missing:(. > > > > > > Do we need to fix this before we start a vote for 0.3 release? > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks > > > Emily > > > ================= > > > Emily Jiang > > > [email protected] > > > > > > -- > Thanks > Emily > ================= > Emily Jiang > [email protected]
