+1 (non-binding) Kind Regards, Andreas
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for the efforts put into this ! > > Regards > Felix > > Am Mittwoch, den 02.03.2011, 14:59 +0000 schrieb zoe slattery: >> Hi all >> >> We have had a huge amount of discussion on the mailing list about the >> merits (and otherwise) of moving to a release-by-bundle scheme. I'd like >> to draw that to a close with a vote. >> >> To summarise, we currently have a release by module scheme but cannot >> use OSGi semantic versioning within this scheme because the maven >> release plugin will not handle releasing sub-modules with different >> versions. The other solution that has been considered is de-coupling the >> 'artifact-version' from the bundle's version, a number of people felt >> that this would be confusing. >> >> >> The proposal is to move to release by bundle and distribution, this will >> give us the ability to >> >> * have correct OSGi bundle versioning >> * use the apache maven release process without changing it >> * not re-release the same code over again >> * supply our users with groups of bundles that work together >> >> This will involve more work for the release manager, but that is the >> only major drawback. >> >> The vote: >> >> [+1] Move our process to release by bundle >> [0] Don't care either way >> [-1] Stay with the process as it is >> >> The vote will run for 72 hours. >> >> Zoë >> > > >
