Hi John, great. Thanks for posting another patch.

Jeremy

On 10 March 2011 22:55, John W Ross <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I don't have an explanation for this. I know at some point I had my
> subsystem-core pointing to 3.7.0.v20110221 and fixed some consequent compile
> errors. Some of these are in the original patch. However, after seeing your
> email, I discovered my subsystem-core was pointing back to the old version.
> After changing it again, I received compile errors on one class,
> SubsystemResourceProcessor. I attached a patch for this on the bug you
> opened.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Jeremy Hughes ---03/10/2011 12:06:09
> PM---Hi John, welcome :-)]Jeremy Hughes ---03/10/2011 12:06:09 PM---Hi
> John, welcome :-)
>
>
>     *Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]>*
>             Sent by: [email protected]
>
>             03/10/2011 12:05 PM
>             Please respond to
>             [email protected]
>
>
> To
>
> [email protected]
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: Aries Subsystem
>
> Hi John, welcome :-)
>
> I've been having trouble building subsystem since the changes in your
> patch and I just wonder whether everything was correct and present.
>
> First up was the subsystem/pom.xml was using Felix bundlerepository
> 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT and those can't be found now because the latest release
> is 1.6.4. This is probably nothing to do with your changes and more to
> do with me having a clean .m2 local repo without a 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT in
> it. So I moved up to 1.6.4.
>
> Then it seems subsystem/subsystem-core/pom.xml is using a different
> Equinox build (3.7.0.v20110110) to the poms in subsystem-itests
> -scope-impl and -scope-itests (3.7.0.v20110221). If I move the -core
> pom to use the newer Equinox level (so the levels are consistent) then
> I get a compile problem - the org.osgi.framework.wiring.Capability
> class is being used - which is no longer present in the Equinox
> bundle. There's a BundleCapability but that's quite different I think.
>
> I opened a JIRA - ARIES-606 to fix this. Is there something you hadn't
> included in your patch?
>
> Many thanks,
> Jeremy
>
> On 3 March 2011 00:26, John W Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to help with moving the Aries Subsystem implementation
> > forward. I work at IBM and participate in the EEG and CPEG groups. I've
> > also been consulting with the Subsystem spec lead, Graham Charters, for
> the
> > past few weeks.  I wanted to introduce myself because I will be providing
> a
> > patch that updates the implementation to the released version of OSGi
> core
> > 4.3. This required numerous, low level changes that had cascading affects
> > across several projects, so the patch is not small. I also added a number
> > of additional tests requiring several configuration changes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
>
>

Reply via email to