I don't think util is ready for a 1.0 release, so an interim is good. On 5 July 2011 16:11, Timothy Ward <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree that we should release as little as is necessary. > > I'm not sure if the current changes to JPA would make it 0.3.1 or 0.4. and > as far as I am aware the only dependency that would also need a release is > org.apache.aries.uitl. I don't know how close util is to a 1.0 release, so > we may want an interim delivery. > > Regards, > > Tim > > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 10:23:40 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] JPA project release > > To: [email protected] > > > > Whoops, missed this thread somehow when I just posted another (!) > > discussion thread. Please take a look at the set of bundles I listed > > over on the other thread to see what you think. > > > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > > > > On 28 June 2011 19:38, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Go for it. > > > > > > On 28 June 2011 11:35, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Tim, > > >> > > >> If JPA works fine with only requirement of a new utils release, it > makes > > >> sense for me. > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> JB > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 06/28/2011 12:23 PM, Timothy Ward wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> There have been a number of calls on the list for a release, most of > which > > >>> seem to be focussed on new JPA function. > > >>> > > >>> I think that the following things would need to happen to get JPA > into a > > >>> place we can release it: > > >>> > > >>> Sort the OSGi 4.3 dependency to remove the Equinox 3.7 download > pomGet > > >>> Equinox 3.7 up in Maven > > >>> Move to the released version of Equinox in the itests > > >>> The JPA container has dependencies on the changes in the uitls > project, > > >>> but I believe it should still work with the latest release of > blueprint, > > >>> proxy and transactions. If this is the case we would only need a > utils > > >>> release at the same time. > > >>> > > >>> Do we think a release is appropriate? Any other thoughts? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> > > >>> Tim > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Alasdair Nottingham > > > [email protected] > > > > > -- Alasdair Nottingham [email protected]
