Am 16.01.2012 um 10:08 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > Well, the point is that it removes a dependency as it's always > provided by the JRE.
But IMHO the price you pay by far exceeds the gain... > I'm far from being a fan of JUL myself, the only way I'm using it is > when redirecting everything to a nicer backend in pax-logging ;-) Which might not work if you run inside a container you don't control (for example the Apache Sling Web Application (which itself launches an OSGi framework). Regards Felix > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:05, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 16.01.2012 um 10:01 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:57, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> * The SLF4J dependency always drags in at least 2 slf4j bundles. Would >>>>> it not be better to have the logging go through the OSGi log service? >>>> >>> >>> Or java.util.logging if the capabiilities of the log service are seen >>> too limited. >> >> Oh, please, not ;-) >> >> Then rather stick with SLF4J. Thanks. >> >> Regards >> Felix >> > > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > FuseSource, Integration everywhere > http://fusesource.com
