So does that mean you agree it is safe to remove the version of AriesFrameworkUtil in r-42?
Alasdair Nottingham On 13 Feb 2012, at 07:47, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Just to be clear, everything that doesn't need r 4.3 or have a compilation > dependency on it should be in util-r42. The aries util bundle is constructed > by: > > - building the classes that don't need r 4.3 > - building the classes that do need r 4.3 and including them and the r 4.2 > classes into the final bundle. > > thanks > david jencks > > On Feb 12, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Alasdair Nottingham wrote: > >> I don't think so. The util-r42 module is a jar not a bundle. The bundle is >> in util/util, so I think we get the util/util version anyway. It appears to >> be redundant. I think it should have been moved, but when the R43Worker was >> added, but it was forked instead, probably because the person who forked it >> assumed, like I did, that util-r42 was a bundle. >> >> Alasdair Nottingham >> >> On 13 Feb 2012, at 00:40, David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Alasdair, >>> >>> Will that have the consequence that Aries util requires a 4.3 core >>> framework to run? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> David >>> >>> On 12 February 2012 11:38, Alasdair Nottingham <n...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We seem to have two copies of AriesFrameworkUtil in the util project, one >>>> in util-r42 and one in util. I think the one in util-r42 can be removed, is >>>> that right? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Alasdair >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alasdair Nottingham >>>> n...@apache.org >
