I think I would need to look at the test output logs. The result indicates
to me that the ProxyWeavingCollaborator service has not been seen which is
odd.

On 14 February 2012 23:35, Emily Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes. I did rebuild the proxy-api and proxy-impl. I am running proxy-itest,
> which pulls the latest version of proxy bundle.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Did you rebuild proxy-api and proxy-impl? Are you running against the
> > latest version of the proxy?
> >
> > Alasdair
> >
> > Alasdair Nottingham
> >
> > On 14 Feb 2012, at 23:05, Emily Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I svn up the latest proxy code and ran into the following test error:
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Test set: org.apache.aries.proxy.itests.WeavingProxyTest
> > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 28.599
> > sec
> > > <<< FAILURE!
> > > checkProxyController
> > >
> [equinox/3.7.0.v20110613](org.apache.aries.proxy.itests.WeavingProxyTest)
> > > Time elapsed: 3.564 sec  <<< ERROR!
> > > java.lang.Exception: Unexpected exception,
> > > expected<org.apache.aries.proxy.FinalModifierException> but
> > > was<java.lang.AssertionError>
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTestMethod(MethodRoadie.java:117)
> > >    at
> org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:86)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.internal.JUnit4MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(JUnit4MethodRoadie.java:60)
> > >    at
> > org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:84)
> > >    at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:49)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.JUnit4TestRunner.invokeTestMethod(JUnit4TestRunner.java:246)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.JUnit4TestRunner.runMethods(JUnit4TestRunner.java:196)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.JUnit4TestRunner$2.run(JUnit4TestRunner.java:186)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
> > >    at
> > >
> org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
> > >    at
> > >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.JUnit4TestRunner.run(JUnit4TestRunner.java:182)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4TestSet.execute(JUnit4TestSet.java:62)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:165)
> > >    at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:107)
> > >    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:60)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
> > >    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:611)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:289)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1005)
> > > Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: Proxy should not have been woven!
> > >    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:74)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.aries.proxy.itests.WeavingProxyTest.checkProxyController(WeavingProxyTest.java:116)
> > >    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:60)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
> > >    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:611)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.extender.impl.internal.CallableTestMethodImpl.injectContextAndInvoke(CallableTestMethodImpl.java:143)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.junit.extender.impl.internal.CallableTestMethodImpl.call(CallableTestMethodImpl.java:105)
> > >    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:60)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
> > >    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:611)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> org.ops4j.pax.exam.rbc.internal.RemoteBundleContextImpl.remoteCall(RemoteBundleContextImpl.java:80)
> > >    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:60)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37)
> > >    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:611)
> > >    at
> sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:322)
> > >    at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:171)
> > >    at
> > > java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:284)
> > >    at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:167)
> > >    at
> > >
> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:547)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:802)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:661)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:897)
> > >    at
> > >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:919)
> > >    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:736)
> > >
> > > Any suggestions about why I cannot get the test passing locally. It
> seems
> > > the build engine Jenkins is ok.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Emily
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks
> > > Emily
> > > =================
> > > Emily Jiang
> > > [email protected]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Emily
> =================
> Emily Jiang
> [email protected]
>



-- 
Alasdair Nottingham
[email protected]

Reply via email to