I ran the full check, but get the following failure.  Does anyone else get this?

RAT FAILURE:?????
src/main/resources/org/apache/aries/jpa/container/parsing/impl/persistence.xsd.rsr
c !????? 
src/main/resources/org/apache/aries/jpa/container/parsing/impl/persistence_2_0.xsd.rsrc

On 20 July 2012 13:36, David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> David
>
> On 20 July 2012 12:24, Holly Cummins <holly.k.cumm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I've staged a release candidate for the next set of jpa bundles. This
>> gets almost all of the jpa component released - only the blueprint
>> integration and itests to go.
>>
>> WHAT'S BEEN RELEASED?
>>
>> The modules are staged and tagged as follows:
>>
>> jpa-container
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa.container-1.0.0
>>
>> jpa-container-context
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.context-1.0.0
>>
>> jpa-blueprint-testbundle
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa.blueprint.itest.bundle-1.0.0
>>
>> jpa-container-testbundle
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.itest.bundle-1.0.0
>>
>> jpa-container-advancedtestbundle
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.advanced.itest.bundle-1.0.0
>>
>>
>> VERIFYING THE RELEASE
>>
>> Instructions for verifying the release are at
>> http://aries.apache.org/development/verifyingrelease.html.
>> Alternately, cut and paste the following to run a full check:
>>
>> wget --no-check-certificate
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/scripts/verify_staged_release.sh
>> chmod a+x verify_staged_release.sh
>> ./verify_staged_release.sh 068 mytempdirectory 2>&1 | tee verifyresults.txt
>> grep FAIL verifyresults.txt
>> grep ERROR verifyresults.txt
>>
>>
>> SOURCE ZIPS
>>
>> Artifacts are in one staged repo,
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-068/.
>> Links to the *.zip files for each module are provided below:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-068/org/apache/aries/jpa/org.apache.aries.jpa.container/1.0.0/org.apache.aries.jpa.container-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-068/org/apache/aries/jpa/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.context/1.0.0/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.context-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-068/org/apache/aries/jpa/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.itest.bundle/1.0.0/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.itest.bundle-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-068/org/apache/aries/jpa/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.advanced.itest.bundle/1.0.0/org.apache.aries.jpa.container.advanced.itest.bundle-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-068/org/apache/aries/jpa/org.apache.aries.jpa.blueprint.itest.bundle/1.0.0/org.apache.aries.jpa.blueprint.itest.bundle-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>>
>> RAT CHECKS
>>
>> The RAT and IANAL build checks mostly passed. Note that, although RAT is
>> configured to ignore *.MF and other files that do not require the ASF
>> licence, theses files are still reported incorrectly as RAT failures. As
>> before, archetype-catalog.xml files fail the SHA checks but probably
>> shouldn't be checked. There are also some spurious RAT warnings for
>> NOTICE.vm files.
>>
>> The licensing of jpa-container is a bit different, so the following
>> failures are reported:
>>
>> src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/LICENSE.vm
>> src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm
>> src/main/resources/org/apache/aries/jpa/container/parsing/impl/persistence.xsd.rsrc
>> src/main/resources/org/apache/aries/jpa/container/parsing/impl/persistence_2_0.xsd.rsrc
>>
>> The license.vm file explains that the *rsrc files are under a
>> different license. None of these files has changed since the last
>> release, and Jeremy was the last person to touch them, so I'm pretty
>> confident they're ok.
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours, closing Monday lunchtime.
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ]  0
>> [ ] -1

Reply via email to