I also like the idea; +1 (non binding) Kind regards, Andreas
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:40 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://wwx.talend.com > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Guillaume Nodet" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Rename transaction/transaction-wrappers into something more meaninful > Date: Mon, Jul 30, 2012 4:06 pm > > > The transaction-wrappers name does not seem very meaningful to me. > I'm going to add a module for JMS support named transaction-jms, so I > wonder if it would make sense to rename that one to transaction-jdbc. > Thoughts ? > > > -- > ------------------------ > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > FuseSource, Integration everywhere > http://fusesource.com
