Do you recall the build number where you saw the OOM over the weekend?

John

>
> Re: Jenkins build is unstable: Aries #1675
>
> I did notice a similar OOM on the weekend, before spi-fly went in. I
> increased the maven heap but I guess that wasn't the underlying issue.
>
> Holly
>
> On 6 Sep 2012, at 14:37, John W Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I see that the subsystem itests have gone nuts starting with build
> > 1674.
> > The execution time is absurdly high and they're followed by an OOM
> > error
> > when the test harness tries to archive the test results. There have
> > been no
> > changes to subsystems since build 1673. The only changes were the
> > addition
> > of spi-fly to the build and a couple of changes to the openejb-
> > extender
> > poms. There's no clear connection but it seems like some change to
> > the test
> > environment must have been the catalyst. I'd like to be able to look
> > at the
> > individual test results but they're not available on Jenkins,
> > presumably
> > because of the OOM. Does anyone know if it's possible to browse the
> > file
> > system on the build machine directly?
> >
> > The only other thing I can think of to do is a local build with a
> > fresh svn
> > checkout and m2 repository to see if it can be duplicated.
> >
> > John
> >
> >>
> >> Subject
> >>
> >> Jenkins build is unstable: Aries #1675
> >>
> >> See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Aries/1675/changes>
> >>
>

Reply via email to