I'll wait until it happens again just in case the build team checks it but
forgets to post to the list. If it does happen again, I'll update the label
expression to exclude ubuntu2 without objection.

John

>
> Re: Jenkins build is back to normal : Aries #1752
>
> +1 good idea.
> On Nov 21, 2012 6:48 PM, "John W Ross" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > As you may have noticed, this has been a particularly bad week for
build
> > stability. This was exacerbated by two outright failures today. The
> > failures occurred, and always occur, when the build runs on ubuntu2 due
to
> > a (Too many open files) error. These failures never occur on any other
> > ubuntu machine. I have sent two notes to the [email protected] list
asking
> > if the ulimit on ubuntu2 can be checked and, if necessary, matched with
the
> > value on the other machines. Until that occurs, I'm proposing that we
> > update the label expression in our build configuration to prohibit
running
> > on ubuntu2 in order to avoid this unnecessary churn in the build
process.
> > There are 4 other ubuntu machines, so I don't think that will have a
> > noticeable impact at the current level of activity. Would anyone
object?
> >
> > John
> >
> > Apache Jenkins Server <[email protected]> wrote on 11/21/2012
> > 12:13:42 PM:
> >
> > > Apache Jenkins Server <[email protected]>
> > > 11/21/2012 12:13 PM
> > >
> > > Please respond to
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > > To
> > >
> > > [email protected], John W Ross/Atlanta/IBM@IBMUS,
[email protected]
> > ,
> > >
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > >
> > > Jenkins build is back to normal : Aries #1752
> > >
> > > See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Aries/1752/>
> > >

Reply via email to