> I'm curious, but how should I (as a user) be able to map the local version
> I have (e.g. 1.0.1) to a numeric version (e.g. 7?). Will there be a mapping
> table? I'm not sure if this wont make it even more complicated from a user
> point of view?
Oh, sorry, that's not what I meant by a numeric version! I just meant 1.0.1
(say), rather than blueprint-core-1.0.1 and blueprint-cm-1.0.1 and util-1.0.1
and proxy-impl-1.0.1 and so on. While we do release by bundle, having every
bundle we ever release in the version list is going to become unscalable, IMO.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Holly Cummins <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> My only concern is that we're rapidly going to have a scaling problem,
>> with the number of bundles we have. a while ago, I wondered about using
>> just a numeric version in the version list. in combination with the
>> component, this could roughly identify the version. It isn't as precise,
>> but since some bugs span bundles, that might be a benefit in at least some
>> cases.
>>
>> WDET?
>>
>> On 31 Jan 2013, at 12:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I saw that the Jira is not up to date around the versions: some releases
>> are missing, and current versions are not yet defined.
>>>
>>> If you don't have objection, I would update Jira to reflect the current
>> versions. It could be helpful for users to provide the versions affected by
>> a bug, and know in which releases the fix will be included.
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
