The Maven release plugin defaults to incrementing the minor number and
resetting the micro number. You don't have top pick the default - it's an
interactive process - but maybe that's what happened :-)
On Feb 8, 2013 5:30 PM, "John W Ross" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Okay, so the consensus is to have the util trunk version set as
> 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> I'm still not clear on whether or not the tool automatically made the
> decision to set the next version to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT (and therefore needs to
> be adjusted since I think we would want the default settings to match our
> version policy) or if that was a user decision.
>
> John
>
> >
> > Re: Aries Util Next Release Version
> >
> > Oh, sorry, I might have got muddled about what we currently
> > suggested doing and what bit of the instructions we were changing.
> > +1 for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, which may need some user intervention during
> > the release to achieve, but which is safest, semantically.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5 Feb 2013, at 21:05, John W Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Just to be sure we're talking about the same thing (my subject might
> have
> > > been a bit misleading), the part of the version policy I'm referring to
> is
> > > the following:
> > >
> > > "OSGi semantic versioning applies to bundles as well as packages. When
> > > releasing a new version of a bundle the change in the bundle version
> should
> > > give some indication of nature of the changes to the bundle. In Aries
> the
> > > bundle version is the same as version of the Maven artifact version.
> During
> > > development, in trunk, the Maven artifact version will be:
> > >      x.y.(z+1)-SNAPSHOT
> > >
> > >
> > > Where x.y.z is the most recent release of the bundle"
> > >
> > > The most recent release of util is 1.1.0. This implies the artifact
> version
> > > in trunk would be 1.1.(0+1) instead of 1.2.0. You're saying you would
> like
> > > to modify the policy and keep the 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT version in trunk?
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Re: Aries Util Next Release Version
> > >>
> > >> +1 to modifying the policy. I think we need to use the minimal version
> > >> increment until proven otherwise. Otherwise we risk breaking
> implementors
> > >> of interfaces in the snapshot build every time we do a release.
> > >> The 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT is defaulted by the release plugin, but it's easy
> > > enough
> > >> to override to the minimal increment when staging the release.
> > >>
> > >> Holly
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, John W Ross <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm also okay with amending our version policy (not sure how old the
> > >>> information on that web page is). I'm not sure I care what the trunk
> > >>> snapshot version is as long as the semantic versioning tool would
> > > detect
> > >>> that a minor version increment is not necessary (if applicable) at
> > > release
> > >>> time and make the released version 1.1.1.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, if we decide to adhere to the version policy as stated, was the
> > >>> 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT automatically generated by the tool (i.e. would
> > > something
> > >>> need to be fixed there) or is that decided by the user?
> > >>>
> > >>> John
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Re: Aries Util Next Release Version
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Feb 5, 2013, at 9:37 AM, John W Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>> I noticed that after the 1.1.0 release, the next version for aries
> > > util
> > >>> was
> > >>>>> marked as 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT. I'm just curious if it's correct to
> > >>> automatically
> > >>>>> assume another minor version increment or if it should really be
> > >>>>> 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT. 1.2.0 seems inconsistent with the version policy
> > >>> specified
> > >>>>> at http://aries.apache.org/development/versionpolicy.html.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm ok flipping them to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT.   Seems reasonable.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That said, you'd have to login to nexus and wipe out the 1.2.0-
> > >>>> SNAPSHOT versions.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Daniel Kulp
> > >>>> [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >

Reply via email to