I agree Christian, good point.
As we "import" javax.persistence* but implement the interface, we should
provide one impl per version.
Regards
JB
On 09/16/2014 01:49 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
I am fine with you tackling this.
I think the reason why we have a problem here is that we implement the
interface. Adding methods is compatible as long as you use an interface.
If you implement it then it is the other way round.
Then e.g. removing a method is compatible. So in our case we probably
can not simply use normal compatibility rules. I think it is a special
case as we wrap the impl. So probably separate impls on our side are the
way to solve this as you proposed.
Christian
Am 16.09.2014 13:09, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
By the way, it's weird that JPA 2.1 is not backward compatible with
JPA 2.0: the interfaces contains the same methods (plus some addition).
Do you have an use case to test ?
Regards
JB
On 09/16/2014 10:57 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Hi all,
we have the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1234 in
aries jpa container.
The current release of jpa container fixes some quite critical bugs but
is now incompatible to aries jpa 2.0.
I propose we revert back to the code before the jpa 2.1 upgrade, then do
a new release that just contains the fixes.
We can then work on some support for jpa 2.1 that is compatible or
advise people to use different jpa container versions depending if they
want jpa 2.1 or 2.0 support.
wdyt?
Christian
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
