Hi Christian today I make some integration test in Karaf 2.4.1 using last version of jpa-experiments and my bundles. I found a problem about EmSupplierProxy. When the class TxBeanProcessor try to getTransactionType call preCall method of EmSupplierProxy that try to retrieve the osgi service instance of EmSupplier. The problem is that this service is registered after, so I have a NullPointerException (after wait 10 seconds). I try to increase the wait period to 100 seconds, but it seems that the registration of EmSupplier service is synchronous and postponed to the wait. I'm thinking that the problem is linked to my implementation of configuration management, because I move the registration of emf to the updated method. I will make a more detailed analysis tomorrow to find a solution.
Regards Giuseppe 2015-04-07 22:04 GMT+02:00 Giuseppe Gerla <giuseppe.ge...@gmail.com>: > Hi all > I try to do some integration test deploying the new implementation with > eclipselink and my test bundle. > I make a change on the logic of PersistenceProvider service filter. To be > abstract I don't want define the class of implementation in > persistence.xml, so in this case I cannot filter using the class name. > I found and fix also some minor issues. > I open another pull request. > > However, I don't make several test (like transaction and so on), but from > my point of the new implementation is more easy to manage of actual aries > jpa. > > > Regards > Giuseppe > > > 2015-04-07 11:54 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > >> Hi guys, >> >> Giuseppe, I like your first implementation. I gonna take a deeper look >> this afternoon. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 04/07/2015 10:23 AM, Giuseppe Gerla wrote: >> >>> Hi Christian >>> I open a pull request with the first implementation. I also add 2 unit >>> test. >>> It seems an easy implementation. >>> Wdyt? >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-04-07 10:21 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net >>> >: >>> >>> I am not yet sure how it would be implemented best. I guess you will >>>> have >>>> to experiment a bit. >>>> >>>> Why would ManagedEMF need to be a non static class? As far as I know non >>>> static classes are only possible as classes inside another class. >>>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> On 05.04.2015 11:44, Giuseppe Gerla wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes >>>>> It could work... with ManagedService. But ManagedEMF should be changed >>>>> in >>>>> non static class and should implement ManagedService interface. >>>>> Right? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christian Schneider >>>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>>> >>>> Open Source Architect >>>> http://www.talend.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > >
