[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14661848#comment-14661848
 ] 

John Ross commented on ARIES-1368:
----------------------------------

I believe this issue would manifest itself when the Subsystem-Content header is 
generated by the system and the fragments are provided by a remote repository. 
The system would be searching for a resource of type osgi.bundle rather than 
osgi.fragment, and presumably the remote repository would have the correct type.

Another manifestation would be when the ESA provider specifies the 
Subsystem-Content header themselves using the correct type and packages the 
fragment in the ESA itself. In this case, the system would be searching for a 
resource of type osgi.fragment, but the type would actually be osgi.bundle in 
the local repository.

I believe everything would work correctly if (1) the Subsystem-Content header 
is generated by the system, and (2) the fragments are packaged as part of the 
ESA.

> BundleResource is not able to compute capabilities for fragments
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARIES-1368
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1368
>             Project: Aries
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Subsystem
>    Affects Versions: subsystem-core-1.2.0
>            Reporter: Wouter Bancken
>         Attachments: 
> OsgiIdentityCapability.OsgiIdentityCapability(Resource,BundleManifest)-CallHierarchy.jpg
>
>
> The computeOsgiIdentityCapability method of the BundleResource is not able to 
> compute capabilities for fragments (only for bundles). 
> This is caused by the fact that the BundleResource is hardcoded to always 
> assume a type of osgi.bundle without inspecting the manifest.
> Link to mailinglist thread: 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/aries-user/201508.mbox/%3CCAL5nZgTOVhdAPYYFOmuV%3DPquAz1a4n_D1Rd3RBrTfu2znCSjKA%40mail.gmail.com%3E



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to