Hi David,
I wasn't clear: I don't mind about the dual license, I mind about the
current Apache license terms ;)
I would prefer a complete Apache license switch without any condition.
Regards
JB
On 03/25/2016 09:31 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
On 25 March 2016 at 08:07, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
it's what I said in my other e-mail: we should wait that Chronicle fully
switches to Apache (and not dual license).
Dual-license is generally not a problem, I think. If a project is
dual-licensed, for example being both LGPL and ASL licensed (without any
further restrictions) then it is fully ASL licensed. AFAIK this is fine.
The thing that is not fine is when they say it's ASL licensed but only
under certain conditions...
Cheers,
David
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
