+1 David
On 16 June 2016 at 12:20, Timothy Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > As I’m sure you’ve seen from list traffic over the last few months I’ve > been working on an implementation of OSGi RFC 221 in Aries. The project > provides implementations of both local and XA transactions, as well as > resource providers for JDBC and JPA. The latter resource provider makes use > of the Aries JPA container 2.4.0 release. > > There has been quite a bit of user interest in the project, and there is > even an OSGi enRoute example being developed using Aries Transaction > Control. Because of this It feels to be the right time for a 0.0.1 release. > This will let people kick the tyres a little harder, and hopefully provide > a good point for collecting further user feedback. > > Obviously the OSGi API being implemented by these components is not final. > To ensure that this doesn’t case a problem I have done two things. Firstly, > the projects are being released at a 0.0.x version, secondly, the OSGi API > packages are being exported with a mandatory attribute of > api.status=aries.prerelease. This forces users to opt-in to using the API. > Obviously the attribute will be removed once the OSGi API is finalised. > > I’ve staged a repository at > > > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachearies-1072 > > The main source release is available at > https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachearies-1072/content/org/apache/aries/tx-control/tx-control/0.0.1/tx-control-0.0.1-source-release.zip > > Please review the artifacts and vote: > > [ ] +1 Release the above artifacts > [ ] -1 Do not > > As a PMC member I vote +1 > > Best Regards, > > Tim >
