Are we also happy to work this into an OSGi RFP/RFC? Regards,
Tim > On 26 Jul 2016, at 16:52, Christian Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: > > In that case I am fine with requiring Java 8 for the build and for fastbin at > runtime. > > Christian > > On 26.07.2016 17:42, Johannes Utzig wrote: >> That would work just fine as long as the build job is compiled with a JDK 8 >> (target can remain with 1.7 for the other modules of course). >> >> 2016-07-26 17:16 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider <[email protected]>: >> >>> I was not aware that CompleteableFuture is a java 8 only feature. >>> Would it maybe work to just require java 8 in the fastbin transport. As >>> the transport is new I would not be much concerned >>> about the compatibility. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> On 26.07.2016 14:27, Johannes Utzig wrote: >>> >>>> Makes sense. However, that means that I probably won't be able to create a >>>> pull request since it wouldn't be able to support CompletableFuture and >>>> the >>>> internal implementation heavily relies on CompletableFuture >>>> unfortunately... >>>> Any idea what timeframe the next major version has? >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Christian Schneider >>> http://www.liquid-reality.de >>> >>> Open Source Architect >>> http://www.talend.com >>> >>> > > > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > http://www.talend.com >
