+1 for better project separation! - Ray
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > It makes sense. > > Regards > JB > > > On 12/18/2017 01:03 PM, Timothy Ward wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The Aries Transaction Control implementation has quite a few pieces, and >> is already substantially separated from the rest of the Aries build. This >> is for two main reasons: >> >> >> 1. The Transaction Control implementation makes heavy use of Java 8, >> which is much newer than required by the rest of Aries >> 2. The Transaction Control project has been implemented using maven >> plugins from the bnd team, not Felix, so the parent pom is more or less >> totally separate from the rest of the Aries build >> >> Given the existing separation, and the general goodness of git (as >> compared to svn) I would like to move Aries Transaction Control into its >> own Git repo. This has already been done for Aries RSA, Aries JPA and Aries >> JAX-RS whiteboard, and I was just going to go ahead with it, but I then >> realised that I should probably sound out the rest of Aries dev, even if >> it’s just a check that nobody else is actively working on it at the moment! >> >> The proposed git repository name would be aries-tx-control.git (to fit in >> line with other Aries projects in git). >> >> Tim >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
