It's ok for me if we stop releasing jmx-blueprint-bundle and jmx-bundle, but then I think we should also remove those sub projects from aries repo.
My vote is not a 'veto'. 2018-01-02 18:25 GMT+01:00 David Bosschaert <[email protected]>: > Hi Dominik, > > Nothing has changed in jmx-api, that's why I didn't release that one. > > The jmx-bundle and jmx-blueprint-bundle you are referring to are 'uber' > bundles that are a combination of other bundles. Since we agreed on this > list to do modular releases for Aries JMX [1] these uber bundles aren't > really compatible with that... I guess they can still be released but they > would need some sort of aggregate version number. > > Personally I don't see a strong reason to release these aggregate bundles, > as using them is really an OSGi anti-pattern IMHO. However if anyone feels > that these should be released they can be released separately. > > @Dominik, I hope your -1 is not a 'veto', if it is please let us know. > Otherwise I think we can continue this release vote and, as mentioned those > bundles can still be released later. > > Best regards, > > David > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1f870e20c5f13da6dd0995f501e9ee > 279a30532efa77125203307ecd@%3Cdev.aries.apache.org%3E > > On 2 January 2018 at 16:17, Dominik Przybysz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -1 > > > > Versions are ok, but you have still missed two bundles which also should > be > > released together in this release. > > I saw your message that nothing in them wasn't changed but they shouldn't > > change - they are bundles which shade those ones you have released: > > https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx- > > blueprint-bundle/pom.xml > > https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-bundle/pom.xml > > > > 2018-01-02 16:05 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon <[email protected]> > : > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > François > > > > > > > > > Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions > > > > updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0. > > > > The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last > > > > release and is thus not included in this set. > > > > > > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8 > > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6 > > > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present > > > > > > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0 > > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0 > > > > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws > > inconsistent > > > > exceptions > > > > > > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0 > > > > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration > > > > exceptions > > > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present > > > > > > > > Staging repository: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachearies-1123 > > > > > > > > Please vote: > > > > > > > > +1 Approve the release > > > > -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why) > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > David Bosschaert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Pozdrawiam / Regards, > > Dominik Przybysz > > > -- Pozdrawiam / Regards, Dominik Przybysz
