Hi, As you started from reporter.apache.org <http://reporter.apache.org/> and added contents, it’s good to me.
Thanks ! Regards JB > Le 15 oct. 2020 à 18:03, Raymond Auge <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > Hey all, > > The report is due and I'm willing to submit it (but I've never done it > before). > > This is what I have: > ------------------------------------------- > ## Description: > Apache Aries software is a set of pluggable Java components enabling an > enterprise OSGi application programming model. > > ## Issues: > - the project is blocked in migration from Apache CMS > - no other issues exist > > ## Membership Data: > Apache Aries was founded 2010-12-14 (10 years ago) > There are currently 58 committers and 41 PMC members in this project. > The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 4:3. > > Community changes, past quarter: > - No new PMC members. Last addition was Carlos Sierra Andrés on 2018-07-02. > - No new committers. Last addition was Romain Manni-Bucau on 2020-01-29. > > ## Project Activity: > - a new sub-component `aries-typedevent` implementing the upcoming R8 > *OSGi Typed Event Service Specification* has started > - aries-rsa-1.15.0 is under vote. > - cdi-1.1.2 release is coming shortly. > - spifly-1.3.1 was released on 2020-10-15. > - jax-rs-whiteboard-1.0.10 was released on 2020-10-05. > - spifly-1.3.0 was released on 2020-05-28. > > ## Community Health: > - defects that are being reported are being handled quickly and efficiently > over the past while. > - the reduction in commits is due to switch from dev of new sub-components > toward more maintenance of said components > - an effort started to migrate the site from the old CMS to some new option > (the selected option was "Antora".) The work was started but because the > option is not well known and seems to involve a fairly complex setup > we've > hit a sort of roadblock and some uncertainty about direction to take > (however the community agrees Aries really needs a new site) This is > presently our biggest challenge > - the large number of sub-components and lack of good website/structured > information is making it hard to produce a cohesive view of the activities > and I feel this contributes to poor awareness/interest > - project traffic is low but respectable otherwise and most queries from > community are answered. > ------------------------- > > This ok? > -- > *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* (@Liferay) > OSGi Fellow
