I reviewed the currently pending PRs on the java side. I opened 2 PRs for the opened java JIRAs from the list: ARROW-777, ARROW-720
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking through them > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hi all, >> >> I'm working to close out the remaining Python and C++ stuff we wanted >> to get in to 0.3 for the sake of other Python projects that want to >> use Arrow. >> >> There are 8 patches up that touch the Java codebase. If we can get all >> these closed out then I think we should be able to cut a release >> candidate sometime next week. >> >> Thanks >> Wes >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > With the Easter holiday and long weekend, we probably will not be able >> > to do an RC until next week at earliest. >> > >> > In the meantime, there are a lot of patches in review. Please keep the >> > release JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670) updated >> > with blocking issues so we can track what patches are in progress or >> > still TODO. >> > >> > Thanks! >> > Wes >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> The current 0.3 goal is good for me. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> hi folks, >> >>> >> >>> We've been making excellent progress toward the 0.3 release -- 123 >> >>> patches in since 0.2, which was released a little over 6 weeks ago. >> >>> >> >>> Here is the JIRA to help track related issues: >> >>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670 >> >>> >> >>> Once ARROW-510 (https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/475, thanks >> >>> Leif!) has been resolved, we'll have all of the date and time types >> >>> reconciled which was one of the major goals for the release. It would >> >>> be nice to get the fixed size binary working end to end (ARROW-634), >> >>> but if that slips to 0.4, I don't think it's a big deal. >> >>> >> >>> I know there are a number of other Java patches in flight; I will let >> >>> others comment on their status. >> >>> >> >>> What remains on the C++ and Python side >> >>> >> >>> * Decimal patch (ARROW-655) >> >>> * Some date and time compatibility with pandas >> >>> * Packaging issues on Linux / OS X, e.g. wheels for pyarrow that can >> >>> be compiled against / linked to by thirdparties >> >>> * Windows support for Python >> >>> * Some miscellanea parquet-cpp integration improvements >> >>> >> >>> If all goes well, we may be able to cut an RC next week or the week >> after. >> >>> >> >>> Is there anything else that others would like to see go into the 0.3 >> >>> release? I think we may be able to make the 0.4 release more quickly >> >>> (~1 month or less after 0.3) as we finish out some of the additional >> >>> compatibility issues (dictionaries in IPC stream/file format is a >> >>> significant one). >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> Wes >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Julien >> > > > > -- > Julien > -- Julien
