I will review it by EOD. On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ice.xell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296, > which is small bug fix. > > If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed > by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release. > > Li > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi all, > > > > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to > > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There > > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be > > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on > > the release page on JIRA: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 > > > > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to > > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review? > > > > Thanks, > > Wes > > > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the > > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached > > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of > > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple > > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after > > > completing the Plasma IP clearance. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm > facing > > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in > the > > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would like > to > > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to > get > > >> some of them solved in the next release. > > >> > > >> Uwe > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > > >>> hi all, > > >>> > > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking issue > > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to > 0.6.0 > > >>> > > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the > > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA): > > >>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 > > >>> > > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for > > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of > > >>> them in the next week or two: > > >>> > > >>> - Fixed size binary > > >>> - Fixed size lists > > >>> - Decimal > > >>> - Union > > >>> > > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the week > > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ > code), > > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, > or > > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Wes > > >
