+1

I verified signature and checksums.
I ran unit tests with Node.js 8.9.1 on Debian GNU/Linux sid.
All tests were passed.

I used https://nodejs.org/dist/v8.9.1/node-v8.9.1-linux-x64.tar.xz .

Thanks,
--
kou

In <[email protected]>
  "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow JavaScript 0.2.0 - RC1" on Wed, 29 Nov 2017 
23:40:45 +0900 (JST),
  Kouhei Sutou <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I tried with Node.js 6.10.2 installed by package on Debian
> GNU/Linux sid then I got the following error:
> 
> --
> % npx run-s clean:all lint build
> 
>> [email protected] clean:all /tmp/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0
>> run-p clean clean:testdata
> 
> 
>> [email protected] clean /tmp/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0
>> gulp clean
> 
> 
>> [email protected] clean:testdata /tmp/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0
>> gulp clean:testdata
> 
> /tmp/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0/gulp/uglify-task.js:40
>     const targetConfig = { ...commonConfig,
>                            ^^^
> SyntaxError: Unexpected token ...
>     at createScript (vm.js:56:10)
>     at Object.runInThisContext (vm.js:97:10)
>     at Module._compile (module.js:542:28)
>     at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:579:10)
>     at Module.load (module.js:487:32)
>     at tryModuleLoad (module.js:446:12)
>     at Function.Module._load (module.js:438:3)
>     at Module.require (module.js:497:17)
>     at require (internal/module.js:20:19)
>     at Object.<anonymous> 
> (/tmp/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0/gulp/build-task.js:21:20)
> /tmp/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0/gulp/uglify-task.js:40
>     const targetConfig = { ...commonConfig,
>                            ^^^
> SyntaxError: Unexpected token ...
>     at createScript (vm.js:56:10)
>     at Object.runInThisContext (vm.js:97:10)
>     at Module._compile (module.js:542:28)
>     at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:579:10)
>     at Module.load (module.js:487:32)
>     at tryModuleLoad (module.js:446:12)
>     at Function.Module._load (module.js:438:3)
>     at Module.require (module.js:497:17)
>     at require (internal/module.js:20:19)
>     at Object.<anonymous> 
> (/tmp/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0/gulp/build-task.js:21:20)
> npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE
> npm npmERR! errno 1
>  ERR! code ELIFECYCLE
> npm ERR! errno 1
> npm ERR! [email protected] clean: `gulp clean`
> npm ERR! Exit status 1
> npm ERR! 
> npm npmERR! ERR! Failed at the [email protected] clean script.
> npm [email protected] clean:testdata: `gulp clean:testdata`
>  npm ERR!ERR! Exit status 1
>  This is probably not a problem with npm. There is likely additional logging 
> output above.
> npm ERR! 
> npm ERR! Failed at the [email protected] clean:testdata script.
> npm ERR! This is probably not a problem with npm. There is likely additional 
> logging output above.
> 
> 
> npmnpm  ERR!ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
> npm A complete log of this run can be found in:
>  ERR!     /home/kou/.npm/_logs/2017-11-29T14_37_00_974Z-debug.log
> npm ERR!     /home/kou/.npm/_logs/2017-11-29T14_37_00_974Z-debug.log
> ERROR: "clean" exited with 1.
> npm ERR! code ELIFECYCLE
> npm ERR! errno 1
> npm ERR! [email protected] clean:all: `run-p clean clean:testdata`
> npm ERR! Exit status 1
> npm ERR! 
> npm ERR! Failed at the [email protected] clean:all script.
> npm ERR! This is probably not a problem with npm. There is likely additional 
> logging output above.
> 
> npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
> npm ERR!     /home/kou/.npm/_logs/2017-11-29T14_37_01_074Z-debug.log
> ERROR: "clean:all" exited with 1.
> --
> 
> It seems that I should use more recent Node.js.
> 
> It may be better that we add "engines" entry to
> package.json.
> 
>   https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#engines
> 
> 
> I'll try again with more recent Node.js later.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> 
> In <CAJPUwMBJvhrpMjBiGLsg=j7o0cs6cxgt9hplcqudzagesqv...@mail.gmail.com>
>   "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow JavaScript 0.2.0 - RC1" on Tue, 28 Nov 
> 2017 14:49:26 -0500,
>   Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Could folks take a look at this release? To get NodeJS and test the
>> release, do the following:
>> 
>> 1. Install nvm, and node
>> 
>> curl -o- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/creationix/nvm/v0.33.6/install.sh
>> | bash
>> nvm install node
>> 
>> 2. Extract tarball, run unit tests:
>> 
>> tar xvf apache-arrow-js-0.2.0.tar.gz
>> cd apache-arrow-js-0.2.0/
>> 
>> npm install
>> npx run-s clean:all lint build
>> npm run test
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Ran dev/release/js-verify-release-candidate.sh
>>>
>>> Verified checksums, signature. RAT report looks OK. Ran unit tests
>>> with NodeJS 9.2 (installed with nvm https://github.com/creationix/nvm)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose the 1st release candidate (rc1) of Apache
>>>> Arrow JavaScript version 0.2.0.  This is a first alpha release,
>>>> made separately from the primary release line so that JavaScript
>>>> can release more frequently.
>>>>
>>>> The source release rc1 is hosted at [1].
>>>>
>>>> This release candidate is based on commit
>>>> 61763504e53fb5531f1d642c399b8ec7b094b337 [2]
>>>>
>>>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, and 
>>>> vote
>>>> on the release. The easiest way is to use the JavaScript-specific release
>>>> verification script dev/release/js-verify-release-candidate.sh.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 24 hours and will close once
>>>> enough PMCs have approved the release.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow JavaScript 0.2.0
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow JavaScript 0.2.0 because...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Wes
>>>>
>>>> How to validate a release signature:
>>>> https://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html
>>>>
>>>> [1]: 
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-js-0.2.0-rc1/
>>>> [2]: 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/61763504e53fb5531f1d642c399b8ec7b094b337

Reply via email to