>From my side, it also look like everything is ready for a release.

Cheers
Uwe

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017, at 08:38 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> It looks like we are in pretty good shape to release next week. We
> have a handful of Python / C++ patches in flight, but I'm hopefully
> we'll be in position to cut the RC1 on Monday or Tuesday.
> 
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> > The turbodbc side is fixed, we sadly did some breaking changes:
> > https://github.com/blue-yonder/turbodbc/pull/138
> >
> > It would be nice if we could keep these APIs stable in the next releases
> > as we get more and more users of them.
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017, at 01:09 AM, Bryan Cutler wrote:
> >> Thanks, Wes. The only outstanding issue on the Java side is ARROW-1864
> >> Upgrading Netty to 4.1.x https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1376.  The
> >> other issues have been resolved or pushed back.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Tom Augspurger
> >> <tom.augspurge...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I've reproduced the dask failures and am looking into them now (it's 
> >> > around
> >> > index metadata).
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hello all,
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm just executing the current master locally against turbodbc and 
> >> > > dask.
> >> > > Sadly it seems that the unit tests in both projects are breaking. I'm
> >> > > going to have a look at what happens in both. We should sort out these
> >> > > problems before the release.
> >> > >
> >> > > Uwe
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017, at 08:06 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> >> > > > hi folks,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I wanted to start a coordination thread to stay on top of the
> >> > > > remaining items to be able to get to a release-able state for 0.8.0,
> >> > > > by end of this week or beginning of next week with any luck. There 
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > a number of housekeeping items we are working on the C++/Python side,
> >> > > > but some of these are non-essential, so we'll try to get done as much
> >> > > > as we can.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Here are the major things that seem to be in flight:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Format changes
> >> > > > --------------
> >> > > >
> >> > > > * ARROW-1785 Removing VectorLayout from metadata
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1297
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Other Java changes
> >> > > > ------------------
> >> > > > * ARROW-1864 Upgrading Netty to 4.1.x
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1376
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Other needed C++ changes
> >> > > > --------------------------
> >> > > > * ARROW-1882: Restoring DictionaryBuilder
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Changes under discussion
> >> > > > ------------------------
> >> > > > * ARROW-1816 Possible change to Timestamp class structure
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1330
> >> > > > * ARROW-1866 / ARROW-1815 Handling of NonNullableMapVector
> >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1371
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Other changes in TODO
> >> > > > ---------------------
> >> > > > * ARROW-1868: Change vector getMinorType to use MinorType instead of
> >> > > > Types.MinorType
> >> > > > * ARROW-1867: Add BitVector APIs from old vector class
> >> > > > * ARROW-1818: Examine Java Dependencies
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Out of these, the ARROW-1785 VectorLayout removal and the Netty
> >> > > > upgrade are probably the most critical -- these should be ready to be
> >> > > > merged once they've been sufficiently reviewed. What else is 
> >> > > > essential
> >> > > > / cannot fall through the cracks? If we are not able to arrive at
> >> > > > consensus on all other items, I would prefer not to delay the release
> >> > > > any further.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks
> >> > > > Wes
> >> > >
> >> >

Reply via email to