>From my side, it also look like everything is ready for a release. Cheers Uwe
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017, at 08:38 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > It looks like we are in pretty good shape to release next week. We > have a handful of Python / C++ patches in flight, but I'm hopefully > we'll be in position to cut the RC1 on Monday or Tuesday. > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: > > The turbodbc side is fixed, we sadly did some breaking changes: > > https://github.com/blue-yonder/turbodbc/pull/138 > > > > It would be nice if we could keep these APIs stable in the next releases > > as we get more and more users of them. > > > > Uwe > > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017, at 01:09 AM, Bryan Cutler wrote: > >> Thanks, Wes. The only outstanding issue on the Java side is ARROW-1864 > >> Upgrading Netty to 4.1.x https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1376. The > >> other issues have been resolved or pushed back. > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Tom Augspurger > >> <tom.augspurge...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I've reproduced the dask failures and am looking into them now (it's > >> > around > >> > index metadata). > >> > > >> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hello all, > >> > > > >> > > I'm just executing the current master locally against turbodbc and > >> > > dask. > >> > > Sadly it seems that the unit tests in both projects are breaking. I'm > >> > > going to have a look at what happens in both. We should sort out these > >> > > problems before the release. > >> > > > >> > > Uwe > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017, at 08:06 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > >> > > > hi folks, > >> > > > > >> > > > I wanted to start a coordination thread to stay on top of the > >> > > > remaining items to be able to get to a release-able state for 0.8.0, > >> > > > by end of this week or beginning of next week with any luck. There > >> > > > are > >> > > > a number of housekeeping items we are working on the C++/Python side, > >> > > > but some of these are non-essential, so we'll try to get done as much > >> > > > as we can. > >> > > > > >> > > > Here are the major things that seem to be in flight: > >> > > > > >> > > > Format changes > >> > > > -------------- > >> > > > > >> > > > * ARROW-1785 Removing VectorLayout from metadata > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1297 > >> > > > > >> > > > Other Java changes > >> > > > ------------------ > >> > > > * ARROW-1864 Upgrading Netty to 4.1.x > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1376 > >> > > > > >> > > > Other needed C++ changes > >> > > > -------------------------- > >> > > > * ARROW-1882: Restoring DictionaryBuilder > >> > > > > >> > > > Changes under discussion > >> > > > ------------------------ > >> > > > * ARROW-1816 Possible change to Timestamp class structure > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1330 > >> > > > * ARROW-1866 / ARROW-1815 Handling of NonNullableMapVector > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1371 > >> > > > > >> > > > Other changes in TODO > >> > > > --------------------- > >> > > > * ARROW-1868: Change vector getMinorType to use MinorType instead of > >> > > > Types.MinorType > >> > > > * ARROW-1867: Add BitVector APIs from old vector class > >> > > > * ARROW-1818: Examine Java Dependencies > >> > > > > >> > > > Out of these, the ARROW-1785 VectorLayout removal and the Netty > >> > > > upgrade are probably the most critical -- these should be ready to be > >> > > > merged once they've been sufficiently reviewed. What else is > >> > > > essential > >> > > > / cannot fall through the cracks? If we are not able to arrive at > >> > > > consensus on all other items, I would prefer not to delay the release > >> > > > any further. > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks > >> > > > Wes > >> > > > >> >