Sounds good.

+1 (binding)

On Dec 15, 2017 7:05 PM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Since Ray has been running on builds of trunk I don’t think we should delay
> the release on account of it. We should consider doing a 0.8.1 within
> reasonably short order and see that Ray is working well with that RC.
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:03 PM Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I ran the release validation and things look good. However, what do other
> > people think about ARROW-1924? I didn't see any feedback on Philipp's
> > comments here.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > * Ran verify-release-candidate.sh on macOS; verified signature,
> > > checksums, test for Java, Python, C++, C/GLib, Java/C++ integration, JS
> > >
> > > Uwe
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017, at 01:01 AM, Philipp Moritz wrote:
> > > > On Ray we are currently blocked from using the 0.8 release candidate
> by
> > > > this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1924
> > > >
> > > > If we don't want to delay the release for longer releasing that's
> fine
> > > > with
> > > > us because we are tracking specific arrow commits and ship these
> > versions
> > > > of pyarrow with Ray. However it would be great to change that at some
> > > > point
> > > > and having a release that works helps to make that happen.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Bryan Cutler <cutl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Built and ran tests for C++, Python, Java (Ubuntu 16.04, gcc 5.4,
> > > > > openjdk-1.8)
> > > > > Ran integration tests
> > > > > Verified signature and checksum
> > > > > Tested downstream with Spark
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Ran verify-release-candidate.sh on Linux (Ubuntu 14.04, gcc
> 4.8)
> > --
> > > > > > verified signature, checksums, test for Java, Python, C++,
> C/GLib,
> > > > > > Java/C++ integration, JS
> > > > > > * Ran verify-release-candidate.bat on Visual Studio 2017 (C++
> unit
> > > > > > tests, Python unit tests, Parquet integration)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Wes McKinney <
> wesmck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd like to propose the 2nd release candidate (rc2) of Apache
> > > > > > > Arrow version 0.8.0 (rc0 was cancelled, I cut but then aborted
> > rc1
> > > > > > > upon encountering ARROW-1917). This is a
> > > > > > > major release consisting of 286 resolved JIRAs [1].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The source release rc2 is hosted at [2].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This release candidate is based on commit
> > > > > > > 1d689e5a3e417d3a4b3de16fea7a6fe195c8f8df [3]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The changelog is located at [4].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
> > > tests,
> > > > > > > and vote on the release.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 0.8.0
> > > > > > > [ ] +0
> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 0.8.0 because...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Wes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How to validate a release signature:
> > > > > > > https://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> > > > > > 3D%20ARROW%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%
> > > > > > 20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.0
> > > > > > > [2]: https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-0
> > .
> > > > > > 8.0-rc2/
> > > > > > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/
> > > > > 1d689e5a3e417d3a4b3de16fea7a6f
> > > > > > e195c8f8df
> > > > > > > [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/
> > > > > 1d689e5a3e417d3a4b3de16fea7a6f
> > > > > > e195c8f8df/CHANGELOG.md
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to