Aside: we should try to settle the discussion we started on the sync
call regarding type annotations -- it may make sense for Map to be an
annotation for List<Struct<...>>, but we will need to discuss in some
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Li Jin <ice.xell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's ok to implement MapVector now.
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Bryan Cutler <cutl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I can't make the sync today, but I did want to ask if everyone is ok with
>> implementing the MapType in Java, which would add the MapVector class. Is
>> this something we can do now or do we want to wait until the next release
>> to give time for the previous rename to settle? Thanks!