Here is our keys file

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/KEYS

Kou is the key-signing winner in our group it seems

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi Phillip,
>
> I think you have it right. The basic idea is that the release
> artifacts being voted on must be placed in the SVN dist system with
> their checksums and signatures. The source release script already
> commits the artifacts and sigs/checksums to SVN [1]
>
> Any released code artifact (source or binary) needs to have a checksum
> and signature so its authenticity can be verified [2].
>
> You will need to commit your GPG public key to the KEYS file in SVN
> since this is your first time. You'll need someone in the network of
> trust to sign your key (e.g. I can sign your key since we are local in
> NYC).
>
> The package build system does not yet have the ability to upload to
> SVN. Probably want to write a script for this:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/tasks/crossbow.py#L533.
> How has this download/sign process evolved since we now have a tag for
> each task, and some of the Linux package artifacts have the same name
> for the different distro targets.
>
> You are almost certainly going to run into problems starting from
> where things stand right now; I'll be available to help as needed
>
> - Wes
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/02-source.sh#L105
> [2]: https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm think I'm still a bit confused about the order in which things need to
>> happen to cut a release candidate.
>>
>> My understanding is that the ordering is:
>>
>> 1. create the source release
>> 2. build packages from the source release (wheels, conda packages, etc)
>> 3. commit source release + binary packages and a signature for each (?) to
>> SVN
>> 4. kick off the release vote
>>
>> @wesm Can you provide some guidance here? I feel like I might be
>> misunderstanding or missing something here.

Reply via email to