I'm cutting RC1 right now, right in the middle of uploading binaries to SVN...
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 9:00 AM Marco Neumann <ma...@crepererum.net.invalid> wrote: > +1 > Tested against a wide range of applications and no obvious problems found > so far. > > For our regular test against master: WIP, ETA around end of September > (hopefully faster). > > Thanks, > Marco > > On August 2, 2018 9:50:49 PM GMT+02:00, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >I think it's OK to proceed with the next RC (RC1) if the code > >described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2963 works > >properly after the fix. Please let us know tomorrow if you run into > >any more issues. Thank you! > > > >On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Marco Neumann > ><ma...@crepererum.net.invalid> wrote: > >> I'll test the PR tomorrow (Friday, until 15:00 UTC). Thanks for the > >quick fix! > >> > >> @Wes Might be doable, I'll check how we can improve there. Sorry for > >catching this problem that late. > >> > >> I'm totally fine with the "no veto" policy. It's a bug for which no > >test existed beforehand, and a behavior / feature that was just > >implicitly assumed to exist (fork stability). So the regression kinda > >"normal". > >> > >> Marco > >> > >> On August 2, 2018 8:40:05 PM GMT+02:00, Phillip Cloud > ><cpcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>Marco, what would be even better is if you would test your > >application > >>>against Antoine's PR before it gets merged. > >>> > >>>On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 2:37 PM Phillip Cloud <cpcl...@gmail.com> > >wrote: > >>> > >>>> I'll cut another one. Can someone review Antoine's PR, like ASAP, > >so > >>>that > >>>> I can cut another RC? > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 2:32 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > >>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> -1 > >>>>> > >>>>> It's up to Phillip whether he wants to cancel the RC, but note > >that > >>>>> releases cannot be vetoed. > >>>>> > >>>>> @Marco, thanks for reporting -- is there a process which could > >have > >>>>> surfaced this issue sooner (e.g. testing your application > >regularly > >>>>> against master)? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Wes > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Antoine Pitrou > ><anto...@python.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Le 02/08/2018 à 20:15, Li Jin a écrit : > >>>>> >> Antoine, > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Do you think we should fail this RC because of Arrow-2963? > >>>>> > > >>>>> > It's a regression, so ideally it should be fixed. > >>>>> > Furthermore, the issue can be reproduced quite easily in Python > >>>with the > >>>>> > (popular) multiprocessing package. > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Regards > >>>>> > > >>>>> > Antoine. > >>>>> > >>>> >
